GRE作文機考經驗分享
爲幫助大家準備gre考試內容，小編在此分享GRE作文機考經驗。希望對大家有所幫助!
GRE作文機考經驗分享
我的GRE作文已經考完了，由於很努力地準備，導致考場上RP爆發，issue抽到超高頻，Argu是考試前最後一次模擬考試寫過的，所以考場上就是直接默寫。現在我把我以前在看帖子過程中收集到的考場上的兩個有用的小技巧貢獻給大家，請還沒考得同學注意了。
第一個是補習老師在他的課堂上透露的得小技巧，就是寫作文的界面上幾個按鈕中唯獨缺少“copy”功能，可以通過按兩次“cut”,然後再點 “paste”來替代。在考場中這一招很有用，特別是Argu中，把前面打的觀點，專有名詞直接粘貼，能節約3、4分鐘寶貴時間。
另外一個是我在太傻論壇一張不起眼的帖子上看到的。機考Issue前有一個適應性練習，規定不能超過30分鐘，讓考生熟悉軟件的用法並且填一張調查問卷。其中有一個部分是熟悉鍵盤的使用，但是我就按照前輩的做法，利用這個機會，先在鍵盤上狂敲了一遍Issue和argu的模板，然後把平常用但容易打錯的單詞敲了幾遍。
大家可不要小看這個細節，它能讓你迅速回憶起模板，進入狀態。否則有的人本來就緊張，結果開始寫Issue時手就哆嗦。不過要注意控制好時間，前面部分不能超過規定的30分鐘。我當時就興奮過了頭，幸好善良的監考官從攝像頭裏看見過了二十多分鐘我還在練打字，趕緊跑過來叫我做後面的調查問卷。
GRE作文機考注意事項
GRE作文考試的流程
考生首先應熟悉GRE作文考試的流程，一般情況下，考生從到達考場到考試完畢，通常分爲以下六步：
第一、考生查考號，領取櫃子鑰匙和夾着紙的硬板，紙上是所要抄的誓言。聽完監考老師講完注意事項後，就開始抄誓言，寫地址條(考生收信地址，英文格式和郵政編碼)。
第二、把隨身攜帶的所有東西(除了兩個證件之外)都存入櫃子裏。任何食品、飲料、滴眼液等與考試無關的物品都不允許帶入考場。注意：考試過程中是不允許脫衣服的，所以考生要視環境冷熱而行。
第三、監考老師開始檢查考生的證件，發草稿紙(六張)。
第四、老師按號要求考生照相(對着攝像頭)，覈對姓名和地址之類的。然後考生進考場，耳塞都掛在電腦桌的隔板上，兩支鉛筆放在桌上。
第五、開始考試後，首先熟悉鍵盤和鼠標和填寫背景調查(這兩個步驟都可以跳過)，填寫兩個筆考考場。然後寫ISSUE和ARGUMENT。最後填寫送分學校。
第六、到了考場門口把草稿紙還給老師。
注：各個考場可能細節上不太一樣，考生們應視具體情況而定。另外，考生還應注意幾個問題。
注意問題一：必須帶好的證件
准考證號是註冊時候發到郵箱裏面的那封郵件上面的號碼，郵件不用打印出來，只要考試時記着號碼就可以。
參加GRE/GMAT考試的考生要攜帶兩類有效證件，其中至少有一個是第一類證件。第一類證件至少有一種是護照、正式居民身份證或軍官證.第二類證件可以是駕駛證、帶鋼印的工作證(不接受工作卡) 、往來港澳通行證、外國人居留證、港澳居民回鄉證或由正規大專院校頒發的學生證(不含五大：電視大學、夜大學、職業大學、業餘大學、函授大學;其他任何培訓性質的院校或培訓項目頒發任何形式的證書均不接受)。
缺少第二類證件，可到考生本人所在學校學生處、單位人事部門、戶籍所在地派出所、檔案所在人才交流中心、街道辦事處開具身份證明信(戶籍所在地派出所開具的證明信應該是有照片、蓋有戶籍章的格式打印戶籍證明。其他證明信需有本人照片、本人簽字、本人身份證號碼，個人體貌特徵描述和經辦單位人事部門電話，經辦人簽字，並且在照片上蓋有介紹單位的公章)。
按照ETS要求，考場不接受以下證件作爲考試證件：(但不僅限於此)：臨時證件(包括臨時身份證、臨時駕駛執照、臨時工作證等)，過期的證件(包括過期身份證、過期駕駛執照、過期工作證等)，國際駕駛執照，社會保險卡 ，任何信用卡 ，公證函 ，工作卡 ，出入證(卡)。
未按要求出示證件的考生，考場有權拒絕其參加考試。持任何假證件的考生不能參加考試。證件方面如果出現問題(例如身份證遺失)或者出現自己無法確定的情況，請千萬提前打電話到考試中心詢問清楚相關事宜。
另注意，如果發生證件不全情況，考試中心會要求考生儘快拿回證件，但是一天只有2場考試，如果在最後一場考試開始後還沒有帶來，就不能再考試了。最後一場在上午11點到場。
提醒：請各位務必自行確認有效證件，避免出現_放棄考試甚至全盤計劃被打亂，事後再後悔不迭的情況出現!
注意問題二：草稿紙的問題
進入考場之後，工作人員會發給每一個考生兩支鉛筆，六張草稿紙。進去之前一定要數一下確認。六張草稿紙是釘在一起的，不要弄散，出來的時候要還回去，一張也不能少，發現少了會很麻煩。如果考場上不發草稿紙，可以給考點要索取。
注意不要在做問卷的時候寫模板。很多考生在做作文前的問卷調查時就在草稿紙上寫模板了，這是不允許的，會被視作作弊。考生可以適當的寫一些提綱，這樣會在寫作時有清晰的思路。
注意問題三：時間的分配
整個考試總共120分鐘。在最前面在電腦上填寫一些個人信息之類的，以及讓你熟悉界面，是45分鐘。 ISSUE 45分鐘，ARGUEMNT 30分鐘，這樣就是120分鐘。 ISSUE和ARGUMENT兩個部分之間沒有休息時間。
如果之前已經用PP3模擬考過的，最前面那45分鐘的很多內容都可以跳過去。但是跳過去的部分節省的時間不能算到作文裏。一旦選擇結束這個調查和熟悉界面的部分，考試立即開始.，即看到作文題時記時已經開始。所以審題和列提綱的時間都是在45/30分鐘內。
另外，左下角有個倒記時的小鐘，前40分鐘可以點擊它，使左上角的數字倒計時消失。但最後5分鐘無論你願意不願意，左上角的倒計時都會出現。
注意問題四：考試時的界面是TXT
TXT只有複製剪切粘貼的功能，沒有WORD的糾錯功能。雖然平時模考的pp3在windows下執行的時候右鍵仍然可以用(因爲是文本框)，真正考試的時候鼠標的左右鍵是完全一樣的，所以提醒慣用鼠標右鍵進行cut或者paste等操作的考生，平時準備的時候要注意到這一點，實際考試時沒有這種快捷鍵。
注意問題五：免費寄成績的學校的填寫
考試前要想好確定自己要填哪幾所學校，哪個專業。學校的選擇是按國家、州、學校、專業來選的，所以考生只要知道學校的全稱和學校在哪個州。BULLETIN上也有學校代碼。雖然給出的選擇的州名不是全稱，但也不是兩個子母的縮寫，每個人只要知道州名的全稱都可以分辨出來那種形式州名的縮寫。如果實在不確定，可以向監考老師詢問。建議考生選與自己水平適合的中等大學，太好的先別選。
注意問題六：表和耳機
關於用來計時的表，如果你想帶進考場，一定要戴指針的，手機或其它電子計時器是不被允許的。
關於耳機，各個考點所提供的耳機是不同的。建議大家開始就戴上耳機，因爲周圍嘈雜的鍵盤聲和因錯誤操作而產生的不絕於耳的“滴滴”聲可能會影響考生的情緒。
注意問題七：考完之後
筆考准考證(AdmissionTicket)從美國ETS本部寄出，目前沒有明確的數據表明在作文考試幾天之後一定可以拿到准考證。如果在筆考日期之前的2到3個禮拜仍沒有拿到准考證，請立刻與ETS本部聯繫。Email地址爲：[email protected]。
能否取得高分，不僅取決於你準備的充分與否，而且在於你發揮的如何。如果你已經準備的很完備，適當的注意一下可能會遇到的問題，熟悉一下考試的過程，參考一下經驗，你就會更加得心應手。
GRE寫作滿分範文1
ing?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
The?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?should?lose?his?job.??It?is?clear?that?his?analysis?of?the?decrease?in?attendance?in?the?past?year?was?incomplete.??A?better?qualified?individual?might?have?explored?the?issue?further?by?doing?several?different?things.??First?of?all,?surveys?of?the?general?population?could?provide?a?clue?to?the?decreased?viewership.?They?may?find?that?people?aren't?as?willing?to?pay?the?high?prices?anymore.??A?survey?may?also?reveal?that?people?are?aware?of?Silver?Screen,?but?opt?not?to?see?the?films.??An?inspection?of?the?nature?of?the?films?made?by?Silver?Screen?could?also?hint?to?the?root?of?the?problem.??If?Silver?Screen?produces?a?lot?of?the?same?type?of?movie,?then?the?problem?may?be?that?they?don't?produce?enough?to?appeal?to?the?diverse?interests?of?the?population.??For?instance,??if?their?movies?typically?contain?excessive?violence?and?foul?language,?parents?won't?take?their?children?to?these?films.??That?is?a?significant?portion?of?the?potential?viewing?population?lost.??
The?ad?director?mentions?that?reviewers?liked?specific?films?and?gave?more??favorable?reviews?than?in?the?past.??But?he?neglects?to?mention?the?specific?numbers-?critics?may?have?raved?about?2?movies?and?turned?their?thumbs?down?the?10?others.??If?thats'?the?case,?it's?no?wonder?that?viewership?has?declined.??
Spending?more?on?advertising,?and?less?on?production,?as?the?ad?director?suggests,?could?drive?the?company?out?of?business.??If?the?media?builds?alot?of?hype?over?a?new?release?that?was?poorly?produced,?people?are?more?likely?to?be?disappointed,?and?skeptical?about?future?productions.??This?is?certainly?not?in?the?company's?best?interests.?What?is?in?the?company's?best?interest?is?a?broader?scope?of?the?problem,?and?different?approaches?to?solving?i??
Commentary??
This?strong?response?begins?with?an?attack?on?the?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?but?quickly?shifts?to?identifying?major?flaws?in?the?argument.??The?main?points?of?the?critique?are?that??
--?the?real?reasons?for?a?decline?in?viewership?have?not?yet?been????identified;?
--?Silver?Screen?may?not?produce?different?kinds?of?movies?to?appeal?to????diverse?interests;?
--?the?number?of?favorably?reviewed?movies?may?actually?have?been????very?low;?and?
--?spending?money?to?produce?a?possibly?poor?movie?could?hurt?rather than?help?the?company.??
Although?more?points?are?made?here?than?are?made?in?the?sample?6?response?on?this?topic,?each?of?the?points?made?in?the?6?paper?is?developed.??That?is?not?the?case?here.??In?this?response,?each?point?is?supported?(by?perhaps?an?additional?sentence),?but?it?is?not?further?developed.??The?paper?is?smoothly?organized?with?few?but?appropriate?transitions.??The?writing?is?strong?with?some?variety?in?syntax.??For?these?reasons,?this?response?earns?a?score?of?5.?
GRE寫作滿分範文2
The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
Although?the?reasoning?in?this?arguement?is?logical,?the?writer?failed?to?consider?other?reasons?for?the?disparity?between?the?percentage?of?people?attending?the?company's?movie?and?the?percentage?of?favorable?reviews.??Perhaps?the?fault?lies?with?the?reviewers?and?not?the?production?company;?the?public?may?not?trust?the?critics'?reviews.??Another?posibility?for?the?attendance?drop?is?that?the?general?public?does?not?find?the?subject?matter?of?the?movies?enticing.??If?that?were?the?case,?spending?less?on?producing?new?movies?in?an?effort?to?re-direct?funds?to?advertising?could?backfire?by?further?limiting?the?types?of?movies?available?to?the?potential?audience.??Maybe?the?general?public?is?simply?not?impressed?with?the?critically-acclaimed?qualities?of?the?movies?(such?as?eloquent?screenplays,?artful?cinematography,?and?realistic?acting)?and?and?would?prefer?seeing?flashy?special?effects?and?big-name?stars.??The?possible?reasons?for?the?attendance?decline?are?numerous;?even?aspects?not?directly?related?to?the?movie?industry?(such?as?the?improving?quality?of?television?programming?and?the?increasing?popularity?of?home?computer?use)?may?play?large?roles.??The?company's?management?would?be?wise?to?consider?and?study?the?entire?realm?of?possibilities?before?making?drastic?changes?in?its?budget?based?on?one?statistical?discovery.??
Commentary??
This?response?identifies?and?analyzes?some?important?flaws?in?the?argument.??Although?the?number?of?points?mentioned?is?the?same?as?that?in?the?sample?5?paper,?this?response?remains?at?the?4?score?level?because?the?points?of?the?critique?are?only?minimally?developed?or?supported.??
The?essay?identifies?four?points:??
--?the?public?might?not?trust?critics?
--?the?movies'?subject?matter?might?not?be?appealing
--?the?public?might?prefer?seeing?special?effects?or?big-name?stars?rather????than?good?cinematography?or?realistic?acting?
--?perhaps?improvement?in?TV?programming?or?increased?use?of?home????computers?has?kept?people?away?from?movie?theaters??
Ideas?in?the?response?are?conveyed?well?and?clearly;?the?use?of?language?is?generally?strong.??But?the?paper's?"bare-bones"?analysis?gives?it?a?list-like?quality.??It?is?therefore?merely?adequate?and?merits?a?score?of?4.?
